Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by IAskWhatIsTrue

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IAskWhatIsTrue (talk · contribs)

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:30, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These were generated by AI not copyrighted IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 11:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

c:COM:VRT

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Timtrent#I_am_drafting_the_Arabid_slavery_article,_someone_of_Arabid_descent_submitted_a_non_finished_draft_they_that_chose_to_add_the_hoax_component

Don't see where to add c:COM:VRT as you have mentioned

These were AI Generated photos IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 11:53, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@IAskWhatIsTrue I direct you, once more, to COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:53, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@IAskWhatIsTrue please just click the link to COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:54, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay:

I see on page

for someone who created file themsleves using AI:

I created the file myself, it hasn't been previously published, and I am the sole owner of its copyright.

Just follow the instructions found on the Commons:Upload page, unless the image/file is of outstanding or professional quality or there is some other reason your authorship may be doubted.

If I here back I will send email but otherwise the person viewing deletion request should see it was AI Generated and that the deletion request should be denied. IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 11:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all: Commons is not the right place for spreading someone's personal "artwork". To me it's AI-generated trash and I don't see any COM:EDUSE for such kind of images. --Achim55 (talk) 22:38, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55 I support your view. Commons is not for creating personal media libraries, vanity libraries. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 09:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a vanity library. You refuse to see reason.

They are being used for an article depicting arabid slavery. So guess what it IS educational value - writing an article about arabid slavery would benefit from pictures of Ararabid slaves.

It's like an article about apple trees would benefit from pictures of apple trees.

An article about dogs would benefit from pictures about dogs.

An article about Christopher Columbus would benefit from pictures of Christopher Columbus.

THese are freely licensed images CREATED BY MYSELF released into the public domain.

I can't believe how lacking in reason these comments not by myself are. SAD. I explained in emails whats happening and you REFUSE to see reason. IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 21:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The uploader has been asked many times to visit COM:VRT to seek to regularise the licencing. That they are not doing so may be a language issue. Potential language issue notwithstanding, they need to follow the processes here. Google Translate is available to them in most languages. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 09:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all as poor quality AI generated images with no educational use. — HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK ∣ enWiki 13:31, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
POOR QUALITY - you joking? These are realistic looking images that stand to the standard of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realism_(arts)

if these were real painters not AI, they'd perhaps be conisdered REALIST painters -
They are being used for an article depicting arabid slavery. So guess what it IS educational value - writing an article about arabid slavery would benefit from pictures of Ararabid slaves.

It's like an article about apple trees would benefit from pictures of apple trees.

An article about dogs would benefit from pictures about dogs.

An article about Christopher Columbus would benefit from pictures of Christopher Columbus.

THese are freely licensed images CREATED BY MYSELF released into the public domain.

I can't believe how lacking in reason these comments not by myself are. SAD. I explained in emails whats happening and you REFUSE to see reason.

SAD that these pictures are being brought up. TIM Trent is not doing this in the good spirits of how WIkipedia should be... Tim Trent should read the emails I sent. IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 21:59, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThis should have never been nominated for deletion - they are my own work from AI . Extremely sad that there is intent so sabotage educational content from being published on Wikipedia - very unreasonable. Tim Trent should have NOT nominated my own works for deletion when they are PERTINENT to the article, if he were acting in good faith he'd withdraw his nomination for deletion, admit the mistake that was made on his part - this would all be the morally upright thing to do . I don't need an apology- simply my wish is you'd stop disrupting Wikipedia. i did visit it COM: VRT, and I went to the section relevant to this issue... and that page had a section on When contacting VRT is unnecessary https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team and it said I created the file myself, it hasn't been previously published, and I am the sole owner of its copyright. Just follow the instructions found on the Commons:Upload page, unless the image/file is of outstanding or professional quality or there is some other reason your authorship may be doubted. IAskWhatIsTrue (talk)

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IAskWhatIsTrue (talk · contribs)

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Further, Wikimedia Commons is not a place for you to upload poor quality pictures for some sort of private album, These have no educational puporse and are out of scope for Commons

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:13, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you copy paste the same thing that you said previously when it was made clear to you that these photos were made from Artificial intellgience- by myself - do you refuse to see reason? IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 21:59, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@IAskWhatIsTrue I direct you once again to use the process at COM:VRT. You need to provide evidence that you are the copyright owner. Do not address me with irrelevant questions, nor with bizarre accusations above. Either do what you are required to do or please be silent. Using block capitals and yelling "SAD" does not make you correct, so I suggest you do neither. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So i did visit it... and i went to the section relevant to this issue... and that page had a section on When contacting VRT is unnecessary https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team and it said I created the file myself, it hasn't been previously published, and I am the sole owner of its copyright. Just follow the instructions found on the Commons:Upload page, unless the image/file is of outstanding or professional quality or there is some other reason your authorship may be doubted.

Why are you keep making FALSE reports against things I CREATED

I suggest you stop interrupting truthful articles drafting and uploading of educational photographs that I CREATED. IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 22:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@IAskWhatIsTrue This is the internet. No-one knows either who you are or that you created these files.You are an anonymous editor (as is your right). It is entirely up to you to decide whether to use COM:VRT to note your stated copyright ownership or not. But arguing abut it here is not going to solve anything. An administrator will close these discussions and either decide to keep or delete these files using policy based opinions expressed here.

Any editor here in good standing may request a deletion discussion for any file that they believe honestly to be out of scope for Commons for any appropriate reason. Once such reason is a perceived lack of educational value. Other reasons are suspicions about copyright ownership or about licencing. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:24, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Go google these images and try to find an original creator - you won't find them . Want to know why? Cause no one made them besides my self. They're unpublished by me before - I'm the creator. Do google image search and verify yourself. You are DISHONEST to keep submitting these false reports for deletion. your so-called suspicions are OFF and dishonest. I made them and you should admit your mistake here so the draft gets published in its optimal form for the benefit of all teh wikipedia reader's education - WITH THE PICTURES not without. IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 22:28, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why do you keep bringing up Commons:VRT when the directions on that page said that nothing needs to be done as they are my own work?

You said earlier a "language issue" accusing me of having a "language issue"... do you understand you accused me of personal attacks previously and then accuse me of having a "language issue" when you are the one who keeps suggesting I use a page and yet the instructions on those page said nothing needed to be done.... you should go and read the page not me... that page says that nothign should be done as they are my own work.

Go use the "find" functionality in your browser for this page and recall how you accuse me of having a language problem, and yet report me for "personal attacks"? How about you own up to your mistakes.. get honest.. and admit that nominating these files for deletion was a mistake as was what happened on English Wikipedia. IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 22:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThis should have never been nominated for deletion - they are my own work from AI . Extremely sad that there is intent so sabotage educational content from being published on Wikipedia - very unreasonable. Tim Trent should have NOT nominated my own works for deletion when they are PERTINENT to the article, if he were acting in good faith he'd withdraw his nomination for deletion, admit the mistake that was made on his part - this would all be the morally upright thing to do . I don't need an apology- simply my wish is you'd stop disrupting Wikipedia. i did visit it COM: VRT, and I went to the section relevant to this issue... and that page had a section on When contacting VRT is unnecessary https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team and it said I created the file myself, it hasn't been previously published, and I am the sole owner of its copyright. Just follow the instructions found on the Commons:Upload page, unless the image/file is of outstanding or professional quality or there is some other reason your authorship may be doubted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IAskWhatIsTrue (talk • contribs) 22:22, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep THese accusations against these photos and nominatinos for deletion are gibberish please read the entire comments by myself to see as to their origin: myself and aritifical intelligence. Tim , the nominator who submitted false nomination, keeps referring to a page COM:VRT and yet this very page says that nothing needs to be done considering the circumstances. Unreasonable gibberish accusations that these photos should be deleted. Sad that people cannot admit their mistakes and own up to wrongdoing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IAskWhatIsTrue (talk • contribs) 22:35, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment as the original author, you should refrain on too often repeating the "keep" tag in the DR, it won't be kept more often because you repeated yourself. Also, you alternate between "I am the creator" and "my AI is the creator", please keep your own arguments straight. I didn't check, but when I believe you the first argument from the OP requestor is disproven. The second argument of the OP requestor is still entirely valid however: There is no realistic educational purpose for "Artistic depiction of fantasy harem girl with chains", aside from documenting the output of racist Art-AIs in the early 2020s. Your AI can probably create some hundred similar pictures next hour if you set that task, but that doesn't qualify the images for en:Slavery in ancient Egypt, or any other article within Wikimedia projects. tldr:

Delete them all! --Enyavar (talk) 23:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BOTH the AI and me are the creator. the AI is the tool I the creator use - it's like a program written https://github.com/features/copilot -its from both the author and the AI, both the programmer using COPILOT and the programmer are responsible for the creation

Are you all friends who know eachother? Did someone reach out to you guys to comment on this? IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 23:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The amusing part about all these is everyone is spoken highly of in the article - yet they issue complaints - why? IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 23:36, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

THe arguments othe OP Requestor are NOT VALID

these are their arguments: "See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP"

both of these are invalid. they are relevant to the article.

It's like an article about apple trees would benefit from pictures of apple trees.

An article about dogs would benefit from pictures about dogs.

An article about Christopher Columbus would benefit from pictures of Christopher Columbus.

THese are freely licensed images CREATED BY MYSELF released into the public domain.

I can't believe how lacking in reason these comments not by myself are. SAD. I explained in emails whats happening and you REFUSE to see reason.

If you want to be a good person you should go back , admit your mistake, and change your comments to a recommendation towards keeping the pictures that benefit wikipedia. IAskWhatIsTrue (talk) 23:41, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]